The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 5310 (Mum-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 254(2)

Since assessee had, in fact, made reference to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited [(2017) 394 ITR 449 (SC) : 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0968 (SC)] and the same had not been considered by this Tribunal while addressing the issue in dispute, this was a mistake apparent on record warranting rectification under section 254(2).

Appeal (Tribunal) - Rectification under section 254(2) - Mistake apparent -

The question arose for consideration was whether non-consideration of the Supreme Court judgment would constitute a mistake apparent on record within the meaning of section 254(2). Held: Admittedly assessee had in fact made reference to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited (2017) 394 ITR 449 (SC) : 2017 TaxPub(DT) 968 (SC) and the same had not been considered by this Tribunal while addressing the issue in dispute. Hence, this was a mistake apparent on record warranting rectification under section 254(2).

Followed:Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited [(2017) 394 ITR 449 (SC) : 2017 TaxPub(DT) 968 (SC)].

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In favour of assessee.

A.Y. : 2008-09



IN THE ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

TaxPublishers.in

'Kedarnath', 7, Avadh Vihar, Near Nirali Dhani,

Chopasni Road

Jodhpur - 342 008 (Rajasthan) INDIA

Phones : 9785602619 (11 am - 5 pm)

E-Mail : mail@taxpublishers.in / mail.taxpublishers@gmail.com