GST HSN & SAC CODES
Get GST Rates Goods
Get GST Rates Services
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Sh. Dharamvir Khosla
Where assessee demonstrated that the alleged investments were made in earlier years and were already recorded in the books of account and reflected in the balance sheets, no addition under section 69 ... Read more..
Mafatlal Mangilal Kothari v. Asst. CIT
Where AO made addition under sections 69/69A solely on the basis of excel sheets and statements of third parties without establishing any direct nexus with the assessee and without granting effective ... Read more..
Rachit Gupta v. ACIT
Gold jewellery found during search exceeded the permissible limits under CBDT Instruction No.1916 dated 11-05-1994, the excess value was liable to be added as unexplained income under section 69. Jewe ... Read more..
M/s. Sri Amman & Co Represented by its Proprietor, Mr. Yogeshwaran v. State Tax Officer, Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST), State Tax Officer, Singanallur (South) Circle, Coimbatore
Where assessee had pre-deposited 10% of the disputed tax and fulfilled all the formalities to sustain the appeal, the case was remitted back to the authorities for reconsideration, subject to depositi ... Read more..
Sri Samy Agencies Rep. by its Proprietor S. Velusamy S/o. Sengoda Gounder v. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, The Deputy State Tax Officer-I, Palani
Where the adjudication order was passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to assessee and assessee was ready to pay 25% of the disputed tax for granting of one opportunity to prese ... Read more..
Manikjeet Singh Kals v. Union of India & Ors.
Where assessee was involved in the activities of availing fraudulent Input Tax Credit, it was found to be in the interest of justice to relegate him to the statutory appellate remedy available under t ... Read more..
Chetan Sunderji Bhanushali v. Hema Ramesh Chheda
Invalidation of cheque on account of merger with another bank would be a disputed question of fact and would be a probable defence that partners were free to take before Trial Court, they had not file ... Read more..
LJ Tanna Enterprises Pvt Ltd. & Ors. v. National Spot Exchange Ltd.
Scheme of arrangement did not contemplate vacation of attachment or closure of any proceedings filed by authorities under MPID Act as a consequence to approval of the scheme, the appellants did not me ... Read more..
Manila Kundara & Ms. Deepali Kundara v. Sh. Ajay Goyal
Petitioners raised defence that no transaction of sale of jewellery ever took place and cheque was misused, but the same was not supported by any credible evidence, petitioners had not filed any evide ... Read more..
Practice Updates
Interesting Decisions
Queries & Replies
Exemption in respect of salary income earned in US
Delay in filing application for renewal under section 80G
Allowability of higher rate of depreciation--Assessee engaged in freight business
Return of income filed after due date
Adjustment of Basic Exemption Limit Against Short-term Capital Gain
Failure to deduct tax under section 194Q
© 2026 - All rights reserved.